- Public Bath Houses Regulation Repeal
- Reproductive Health Facility Access Protection
- Mental Health Services Act Update (FY 2024-2025)
- Liquor Licenses for Nihon Whisky Lounge and AJ’s Bar
- Other Topics
Public Bath Houses Regulation Repeal
History and Legislative Complexity
The committee discussed a proposal to repeal Article 26 of the Police Code, which has regulated bathhouses in San Francisco since the 1920s. Supervisor Mandelman presented a historical overview, explaining how outdated laws and stigma around LGBTQ spaces hindered progress. The regulations—initially implemented to address public health concerns during the HIV/AIDS epidemic—are now considered obsolete due to modern advancements in HIV prevention and treatment.
Public Comments and Community Impact
Public comments overwhelmingly supported the repeal. Speakers, including LGBTQ advocates and public health experts, emphasized the importance of bathhouses as community spaces. They also criticized the existing law’s unnecessary restrictions, such as police oversight and the prohibition of locked doors, which they argued are ineffective and stigmatizing. The repeal aims to create safer, regulated spaces and encourage community connections. The committee voted to move the proposal forward.
Reproductive Health Facility Access Protection
Expanding Buffer Zones
The committee debated an ordinance to strengthen protections for reproductive health clinics. The proposal extends buffer zones from 50 to 100 feet to prevent harassment and intimidation. Supervisor Stefani’s office presented data on increasing threats to reproductive health facilities and emphasized the need for local action in light of national trends restricting reproductive rights.
Harrowing Testimonies
Planned Parenthood staff and volunteers shared firsthand accounts of protesters intimidating patients, using megaphones, and blocking clinic entrances. They highlighted the emotional and logistical challenges posed by such harassment. The ordinance aims to protect both patients and clinic staff while balancing First Amendment rights. The proposal received unanimous support from the committee.
Mental Health Services Act Update (FY 2024-2025)
Comprehensive Program Review
The Department of Public Health outlined updates to mental health services funded by state taxes on high-income earners. Programs included housing for unhoused individuals with mental health challenges, vocational training, and early intervention services. The department also discussed outcomes such as reduced substance use and improved family relationships among participants.
Future Goals
New initiatives will align with Proposition 1, focusing on housing and substance abuse treatment. The committee commended the department for its community engagement and long-term planning. The proposal was referred to the full Board with support.
Liquor Licenses for Nihon Whisky Lounge and AJ’s Bar
Nihon Whisky Lounge
This venue sought to reinstate its liquor license after closing during the pandemic. Supporters described the lounge as a beloved neighborhood fixture and praised its contributions to the local economy. The committee approved the request, highlighting the importance of revitalizing nightlife in the area.
AJ’s Bar
AJ’s Bar requested a license transfer for its Market Street location. The owner outlined plans for affordable drinks and a welcoming atmosphere, emphasizing the need for accessible venues in the neighborhood. The committee expressed strong support for the bar’s potential to contribute to Market Street’s revitalization.
Other Topics
- Massage Business Background Checks: A resolution was passed to authorize state and federal background checks for massage business permits, simplifying the process and removing barriers for women of color.
- Firearms Procurement Policy: The committee extended a policy exemption allowing firearm purchases from existing suppliers through June 2025.
The meeting covered significant community-focused topics, balancing updates to outdated policies with measures to enhance public health and safety. Each decision aimed to reflect San Francisco’s values of inclusivity, equity, and forward-thinking governance.

Leave a comment